On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:02:15AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:09:47PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:21 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > index 289c231..7973ab5 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct net_device_stats {
> > > unsigned long tx_window_errors;
> > > unsigned long rx_compressed;
> > > unsigned long tx_compressed;
> > > + unsigned long rx_unhandled;
> > > };
> > >
> >
> > This structure is deprecated, please do not add new fields in it,
> > as it will increase netlink answers for no good reason.
> >
> > rtnl_link_stats64 is what really matters these days.
>
> I'll respin the set without that, along with s/unhandled/nohandler/, which
> I somehow got screwed up in my head and realized a split second after
> hitting send. Outside of that, does this approach look sane? Should I
> bother with touching /proc/net/dev output or not?
Also, please excuse the poor excuse for a cover-letter that had a
duplicate of patch 1 in it. I'll fix that the next pass too.
/me hangs head in shame...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
