On 28/01/2016 at 00:33:47 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote :
> On 01/27, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > @@ -399,13 +400,33 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
> > &at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
> > }
> >
> > +static __initconst struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_ids[] = {
>
> The kbuild error is weird, but __initconst should come right
> before the equals sign (=). Plus it should actually be const.
>
Yeah, I sent v5, right after v4. I had that change but forgot to squash
it.
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9n12-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-pmc" },
> > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" },
> > + { /* sentinel */ },
> > +};
> > +
> > static void __init at91_pm_init(void)
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
