On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:13:48PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > would the following two bindings be ok ? I would create patches to add them.
> * regulator-allow-mode; or regulator-allow-change-mode; This seems redundant, if we have a list of valid modes presumably they can be used - same idea as with voltage setting. > * regulator-modes = <REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY>; I'm not convinced this binding makes sense, how would a user of the API (currently there are none in tree) know what the modes mean? It's a bit different when the user is supplying configuration for a specific regulator but this needs to be something that can be used by consumers. What are you actually trying to do with this?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
