On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:33:25AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I broke iopl(2) with my syscall rework. Fix it up. While debugging
> it, I found a bug in my IRQ state handling. Fix that, too.
>
> Andy Lutomirski (3):
> x86/entry/64: Fix an IRQ state error on ptregs-using syscalls
> x86/entry/64: Fix fast-path syscall return register state
> x86/syscalls/64: Mark sys_iopl as using ptregs
>
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Looks good so far:
Reported-and-tested-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
We better hammer on those a lot more until the next merge window for
more confidence.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
