On 02/02/2016 08:11 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> +void __weak arch_show_smap(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct
>> *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>
> Is it valid that this serves also as a declaration? Or should it be also
> in some header?I guess having it in a header would make it less likely that someone screws up a definition farther down the line. But, it also seemed a wee bit of overkill for a single user. I'm happy to send a follow-on patch to add it to a header somewhere.
