From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>

If we're going to BUG_ON() because we're running on the wrong CPU, we
better do it as the first thing we do when entering that function. And
also, turn it into a WARN_ON() because it is not worth to panic the
system if we apply the microcode on the wrong CPU - we're simply going
to exit early.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index d1b2f583f543..c029c2bb2a29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -843,12 +843,12 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
        int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
        struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
 
-       uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
-       mc = uci->mc;
-
        /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
-       BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
+       if (WARN_ON(cpu_num != cpu))
+               return -1;
 
+       uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+       mc = uci->mc;
        if (!mc)
                return 0;
 
-- 
2.3.5

Reply via email to