Alan Cox wrote: > > > Why not solve the problem at the source and completely redesign the > > network stack? Get rid of the old sk_buff & co! Rip the whole network > > layer out! Redesign it and give the user a possibility of Zero-Copy > > networking! > > For one because you don't need to do that to get zero copy networking for > most real world cases. Tux already implements the neccessary infrastructure > for these. And what if I'd like to use the network for something different than html? I'm sorry but I don't know TUX. Does it implement its own TCP stack? Reto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Roger Larsson
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Reto Baettig
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Reto Baettig
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jesse Pollard
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Horst von Brand
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Jesse Pollard
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Ro... Horst von Brand
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Reto Baettig