On 03-02-16, 14:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > It looks like patches [1-5/6] are not objectionable and I can apply > them without the last one if you want me to.
Looks fine to me. -- viresh
On 03-02-16, 14:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > It looks like patches [1-5/6] are not objectionable and I can apply > them without the last one if you want me to.
Looks fine to me. -- viresh