On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 23:53 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> This patch adds a variable 'a' which indicates that the 'p',
> 'f', and 's' options should be toggled on or off depending on
> whether or not those parameters are actually valid inside the
> passed sockaddr.

OK

> This is something that probably most users of
> the %pIS family of functions will prefer to use.

More doubtful.

There isn't a single user of flowinfo or scope today.

These are the current uses of %pIS

      8 %pIS
     11 %pISc
      5 %pIScp
      2 %pISp
     23 %pISpc

> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> @@ -1169,9 +1169,18 @@ char *ip6_addr_string_sa(char *buf, char *end, const 
> struct sockaddr_in6 *sa,
>               case 'c':
>                       have_c = true;
>                       break;
> +             case 'a':
> +                     have_a = true;
> +                     break;
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     if (have_a) {
> +             have_p = sa->sin6_port != 0;
> +             have_s = sa->sin6_scope_id != 0;
> +             have_f = sa->sin6_flowinfo != 0;

Doesn't this needs the mask tested?

                sa->sin6_flowinfo & IPV6_FLOWINFO_MASK

given the use of bool, the != 0 are unnecessary.

Other than that, looks good to me.

Reply via email to