On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:30:49 +0000 Juri Lelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've actually changed a bit this approach, and things seem better here. > Could you please give this a try? (You can also fetch the same branch). It appears to fix the one issue I pointed out, but it doesn't fix the issue with cpusets. # burn& # TASK=$! # schedtool -E -t 2000000:20000000 $TASK # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/my_cpuset # echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/my_cpuset/cpuset.cpus # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 209714 It appears to add double the bandwidth. # kill $TASK # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 Now we have used bandwidth with nothing running. # rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/my_cpuset # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 104857 And now that bandwidth is leaked, but it seems we can get it back with the old sched_load_balance trick. # echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance # grep dl /proc/sched_debug dl_rq[0]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[1]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[2]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[3]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[4]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[5]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[6]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 dl_rq[7]: .dl_nr_running : 0 .dl_bw->bw : 996147 .dl_bw->total_bw : 0 -- Steve
