is_pos only useful for tracking events (fork, mmap, exit, ...).
Perf collects those events through evsel with 'tracking' set.
Therefore, there's no need to validate every is_pos against
evlist->is_pos.

This patch is required after perf support PERF_SAMPLE_TAILSIZE.
Since there an extra u64 at the end of this type of evsels, is_pos
for evsel with PERF_SAMPLE_TAILSIZE setting is different from other
evsels.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: He Kuang <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Zefan Li <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
 tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index 9b56390..90a9820 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -1274,8 +1274,15 @@ bool perf_evlist__valid_sample_type(struct perf_evlist 
*evlist)
                return false;
 
        evlist__for_each(evlist, pos) {
-               if (pos->id_pos != evlist->id_pos ||
-                   pos->is_pos != evlist->is_pos)
+               if (pos->id_pos != evlist->id_pos)
+                       return false;
+               /*
+                * Only tracking events needs is_pos. Those events are
+                * collected if evsel->tracking is selected.
+                * For other evsel, is_pos is useless for other evsels,
+                * so skip validating them.
+                */
+               if (pos->tracking && pos->is_pos != evlist->is_pos)
                        return false;
        }
 
-- 
1.8.3.4

Reply via email to