On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 02:52:11PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > The numbers don't lie. You know where the code is. You notice that > there is a version of > the kernel hand coded in assembly language. You'l also noticed that > it's SMP and takes ZERO LOCKS during context switching, in fact, most of > the design is completely lockless. I suspect most of the confusion in this thread comes because you seem to use a different definition of context switch than Ingo and others. Could you explain what you exactly mean with a context switch ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Davide Libenzi
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Larry McVoy
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Larry McVoy
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! David Lang
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! David Lang