On Sunday, February 07, 2016 09:10:24 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-02-16, 16:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to > > get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the > > reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is > > actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy > > object directy via its argument. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > Why the hell did we write it that way earlier ? :)
Honestly, I have no idea. > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> Thanks!
