On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:45:08 +0000 Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The kernel community needs to get a grip with the implementation of > new syscalls - we need a process where architecture maintainers get > to review the arguments _prior_ to them being accepted into the kernel. > That way we can avoid silly architecture specific syscall changes like > this. hm, well, actually, sys_fadvise64_64 was discussed on linux-arch when it went in. (Gad, it was over three years ago! - glibc support should be pretty widespread now) That's about as much discussion as these things will get. And this assumes that people remember to mention it. Mental note made. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
