On 8.2.2016 17:43, Suganath prabu Subramani wrote:
> Module parameter to enable/disable configuring
> affinity hint for msix vector.
> SMP affinity feature can be enabled/disabled by setting
> module parameter "smp_affinity_enable" to 1/0.
> By default this feature is enabled. (smp_affinity_enable = 1 enabled).
>
> Signed-off-by: Suganath prabu Subramani
> <suganath-prabu.subram...@avagotech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitra P B <chaitra.basa...@avagotech.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 37
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> index 31838d9a..582ba4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,10 @@ static int msix_disable = -1;
> module_param(msix_disable, int, 0);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(msix_disable, " disable msix routed interrupts
> (default=0)");
>
> +static int smp_affinity_enable = 1;
> +module_param(smp_affinity_enable, int, S_IRUGO);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(smp_affinity_enable, "SMP affinity feature enable/disbale
> Default: enable(1)");
> +
> static int max_msix_vectors = -1;
> module_param(max_msix_vectors, int, 0);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_msix_vectors,
> @@ -1812,8 +1816,10 @@ _base_free_irq(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(reply_q, next, &ioc->reply_queue_list, list) {
> list_del(&reply_q->list);
> - irq_set_affinity_hint(reply_q->vector, NULL);
> - free_cpumask_var(reply_q->affinity_hint);
> + if (smp_affinity_enable) {
> + irq_set_affinity_hint(reply_q->vector, NULL);
> + free_cpumask_var(reply_q->affinity_hint);
> + }
> synchronize_irq(reply_q->vector);
> free_irq(reply_q->vector, reply_q);
> kfree(reply_q);
> @@ -1844,9 +1850,13 @@ _base_request_irq(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u8
> index, u32 vector)
> reply_q->msix_index = index;
> reply_q->vector = vector;
>
> - if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&reply_q->affinity_hint, GFP_KERNEL))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - cpumask_clear(reply_q->affinity_hint);
> + if (smp_affinity_enable) {
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&reply_q->affinity_hint, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + kfree(reply_q);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + cpumask_clear(reply_q->affinity_hint);
I think, that with zalloc_cpumask_var we no more need the cpumask_clear here
Please remove it in next patchset.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <the...@redhat.com>
Tomas
