From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> The atomic work counter incrementation in gov_cancel_work() is not necessary any more, because work items won't be queued up after gov_clear_update_util() anyway, so drop it along with the comment about how it may be missed by the gov_clear_update_util().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -195,13 +195,6 @@ static inline void gov_clear_update_util static void gov_cancel_work(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs) { - /* Tell dbs_update_util_handler() to skip queuing up work items. */ - atomic_inc(&policy_dbs->work_count); - /* - * If dbs_update_util_handler() is already running, it may not notice - * the incremented work_count, so wait for it to complete to prevent its - * work item from being queued up after the cancel_work_sync() below. - */ gov_clear_update_util(policy_dbs->policy); irq_work_sync(&policy_dbs->irq_work); cancel_work_sync(&policy_dbs->work); @@ -264,7 +257,6 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(stru * The work may not be allowed to be queued up right now. * Possible reasons: * - Work has already been queued up or is in progress. - * - The governor is being stopped. * - It is too early (too little time from the previous sample). */ if (atomic_inc_return(&policy_dbs->work_count) == 1) {
