From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> The inode is printed with a %llu format specifier when the intention is to print a hexadecimal value. Trivial fix to use %llx instead. Found with smatch static analysis:
fs/exofs/dir.c:138 exofs_check_page() warn: '0x' prefix is confusing together with '%llu' specifier Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> --- fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/exofs/dir.c b/fs/exofs/dir.c index e5bb2ab..9a8eba6 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/dir.c +++ b/fs/exofs/dir.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ Espan: bad_entry: EXOFS_ERR( "ERROR [exofs_check_page]: bad entry in directory(0x%lx): %s - " - "offset=%lu, inode=0x%llu, rec_len=%d, name_len=%d\n", + "offset=%lu, inode=0x%llx, rec_len=%d, name_len=%d\n", dir->i_ino, error, (page->index<<PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)+offs, _LLU(le64_to_cpu(p->inode_no)), rec_len, p->name_len); -- 2.7.0
