On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> --- 0001/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Makefile
>> +++ work/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Makefile 2016-02-15 19:56:50.720513000
> +0900
>> @@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
>> sh-pfc-objs = core.o pinctrl.o
>> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_GPIO_SH_PFC),y)
>> -sh-pfc-objs += gpio.o
>> -endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SH_PFC) += sh-pfc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PFC_EMEV2) += pfc-emev2.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PFC_R8A73A4) += pfc-r8a73a4.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PFC_R8A7740) += pfc-r8a7740.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PFC_R8A73A4) += pfc-r8a73a4.o gpio.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PFC_R8A7740) += pfc-r8a7740.o gpio.o
>
> Instead of duplicating gpio.o for every PFC entry that uses it, how about
> keeping it above and just using CONFIG_PINCTRL_SH_PFC_GPIO in the ifeq ?
Or not using the ifeq, but using
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SH_PFC_GPIO) += gpio.o
instead?
Is there any specific reason for the existence of the sh-pfc-objs intermediate?
It's not like we can/want to have a modular pinctrl driver...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
