On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:19:18AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:08:28PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > @@ -1349,6 +1427,17 @@ static void output_resort(struct hists *hists,
> > struct ui_progress *prog,
> >
> > min_callchain_hits = callchain_total * (callchain_param.min_percent /
> > 100);
> >
> > + hists__reset_stats(hists);
> > + hists__reset_col_len(hists);
> > +
> > + if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy) {
> > + return hists__hierarchy_output_resort(hists, prog,
> > + &hists->entries_collapsed,
> > + &hists->entries,
> > + min_callchain_hits,
> > + use_callchain);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (sort__need_collapse)
> > root = &hists->entries_collapsed;
> > else
> > @@ -1357,9 +1446,6 @@ static void output_resort(struct hists *hists, struct
> > ui_progress *prog,
> > next = rb_first(root);
> > hists->entries = RB_ROOT;
>
> above line could be moved together with those 2 below
> and you can then remove *root_out = RB_ROOT; line in
> hists__hierarchy_output_resort
Nope. The root_out should be initialized anyway since it's called
recursively with child's hroot_out.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> >
> > - hists__reset_stats(hists);
> > - hists__reset_col_len(hists);
> > -
> > while (next) {
> > n = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry, rb_node_in);
> > next = rb_next(&n->rb_node_in);
> > --
> > 2.7.1
> >
