On 02/21/2016 02:50 PM, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
Fixed a coding style issue.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Loctaux <[email protected]>
---
  fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 5fb60ea..7914dd2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct 
__btrfs_workqueue *wq)
  out:
        spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
- if (need_change) {
+       if (need_change)
                workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
-       }
+
  }
static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
I thought I proposed this exact patch...hmm...

Reply via email to