On (02/22/16 13:54), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > well, at the same time zram must not dictate what to do. zram simply spoils
> > zsmalloc; it does not offer guaranteed good compression, and it does not let
> > zsmalloc to do it's job. zram has only excuses to be the way it is.
> > the existing zram->zsmalloc dependency looks worse than zsmalloc->zram to
> > me.
>
> I don't get it why you think it's zram->zsmalloc dependency.
clearly 'dependency' was simply a wrong word to use, 'enforcement' or 'policy'
are better choices here. but you got my point.
-ss
