On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:54:17PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of a > BUG() exception. They handle warnings in report_bug() in lib/bug.c. > > 2) All other architectures just call warn_slowpath_*() directly. Their > warnings are handled in warn_slowpath_common() in kernel/panic.c. > > Support traceoff_on_warning on all architectures and prevent any future > divergence by using a single common function to emit the warning. > > Also remove the '()' from '%pS()', because the parentheses look funky: > > [ 45.607629] WARNING: at /root/warn_mod/warn_mod.c:17 > .init_dummy+0x20/0x40 [warn_mod]() > > Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> > --- > Based on linux-next/master. > > include/asm-generic/bug.h | 7 +++++++ > kernel/panic.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > lib/bug.c | 27 +++------------------------ > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Nice! Just tested this on s390. Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

