From: Kinglong Mee <[email protected]> 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
=============== commit 86108c2e34a26e4bec3c6ddb23390bf8cedcf391 upstream. If netfs exist, fscache should not increase the reference of parent's usage and n_children, otherwise, never be decreased. v2: thanks David's suggest, move increasing reference of parent if success use kmem_cache_free() freeing primary_index directly v3: don't move "netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index;" Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> --- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fscache/netfs.c b/fs/fscache/netfs.c index b1bb6117473a..04e18d28013b 100644 --- a/fs/fscache/netfs.c +++ b/fs/fscache/netfs.c @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs; - atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); - atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); - spin_lock_init(&netfs->primary_index->lock); INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects); @@ -61,6 +58,9 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) goto already_registered; } + atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); + atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); + list_add(&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list); ret = 0; @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ already_registered: up_write(&fscache_addremove_sem); if (ret < 0) { - netfs->primary_index->parent = NULL; - __fscache_cookie_put(netfs->primary_index); + kmem_cache_free(fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index); netfs->primary_index = NULL; } -- 2.7.1
