On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:34:55 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The patches will be a bit of a pain to maintain but surprisingly they > > > apply OK at present. It's possible that by the time they hit upstream, > > > some direct ->_count references will still be present and it will > > > require a second pass to complete the conversion. > > > > In fact, the patch doesn't change direct ->_count reference for > > *read*. That's the reason that it is surprisingly OK at present. > > > > It's a good idea to change direct ->_count reference even for read. > > How about changing it in rc2 after mering this patch in rc1? > > Sounds fair enough. > > Although I'm counting only 11 such sites so perhaps we just go ahead > and do it?
Okay. It's less than I thought. I will do it soon. Thanks.
