* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 'objtool check' reports the following false positive warning:
>
> objtool: arch/x86/xen/enlighten.o: xen_cpuid()+0x41: can't find jump dest
> instruction at .text+0x108
>
> The warning is due to xen_cpuid()'s use of XEN_EMULATE_PREFIX to insert
> some fake instructions which objtool doesn't know how to decode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vra...@citrix.com>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index d09e4c9..b7f5909 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/edd.h>
> +#include <linux/objtool.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> @@ -351,8 +352,8 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx,
> *cx &= maskecx;
> *cx |= setecx;
> *dx &= maskedx;
> -
> }
> +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(xen_cpuid); /* XEN_EMULATE_PREFIX */
Could you please change the title and changelog of all such annotation patches
to
say something like:
x86/xen: Mark xen_cpuid() stack frame as non-standard
?
It's not an objtool whitelist anymore, but a more generic annotation that
objtool
uses.
Thanks,
Ingo
