On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:57:28PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 02/25/2016 12:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > Patch 9 re-enables XSAVES. > > Could we also add one more thing to this: A big, fat warning that > supervisor states are not supported? We might get that from an eventual > use of xfeature_uncompacted_offset(), but we need something that's very > clear. > > I just don't want somebody coming along and shoving a supervisor state > in to XCR0 and expecting it to work just because we have XSAVES support > itself. That might happen in-tree or out-of-tree as things get prototyped.
I will do that. Yu-cheng
