3.2.77-rt111-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>

I see here large latencies during a stack dump on x86. The
preempt_disable() and get_cpu() should forbid moving the task to another
CPU during a stack dump and avoiding two stack traces in parallel on the
same CPU. However a stack trace from a second CPU may still happen in
parallel. Also nesting is allowed so a stack trace happens in
process-context and we may have another one from IRQ context. With migrate
disable we keep this code preemptible and allow a second backtrace on
the same CPU by another task.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 5e890ccd5429..530fdb80d250 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs 
*regs,
                unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
                const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
 {
-       const unsigned cpu = get_cpu();
+       const unsigned cpu = get_cpu_light();
        unsigned long *irq_stack_end =
                (unsigned long *)per_cpu(irq_stack_ptr, cpu);
        unsigned used = 0;
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs 
*regs,
         * This handles the process stack:
         */
        bp = ops->walk_stack(tinfo, stack, bp, ops, data, NULL, &graph);
-       put_cpu();
+       put_cpu_light();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
 
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs 
*regs,
        int cpu;
        int i;
 
-       preempt_disable();
+       migrate_disable();
        cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
        irq_stack_end   = (unsigned long *)(per_cpu(irq_stack_ptr, cpu));
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs 
*regs,
                printk(KERN_CONT " %016lx", *stack++);
                touch_nmi_watchdog();
        }
-       preempt_enable();
+       migrate_enable();
 
        printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
        show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
-- 
2.7.0


Reply via email to