On Sun, 28 Feb 2016, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2016, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> >>
> >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> >> master
> >> head: 691429e13dfaf5b0994b07cc166db41bd608ee3d
> >> commit: 3795de236d67a05994a1a12759db9d4dd9ffc42c genirq: Distangle
> >> kernel/irq/handle.c
> >> date: 5 years ago
> >> config: m68k-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> >> reproduce:
> >> wget
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> >> -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >> git checkout 3795de236d67a05994a1a12759db9d4dd9ffc42c
> >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >> make.cross ARCH=m68k
> >
> > Again. This commit is just moving code into seperate files without changing
> > the code. So it's not a new wreckage.
> >
> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >>
> >> In file included from include/linux/irqnr.h:10:0,
> >> from include/linux/irq.h:22,
> >> from kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:10:
> >> arch/m68k/include/asm/irq.h:25:17: error: expected identifier or '('
> >> before numeric constant
> >> #define NR_IRQS 0
> >> ^
> >
> > NR_IRQS = 0 and CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ=n is bogus. That alldefconfig of m68k is
> > broken. Cc'ed m68 folks
>
> No idea where this "alldefconfig" is coming from (it contains "2.6.36-rc5").
> Is this an MMU=y allnoconfig?
# make alldefconfig
That's one of the targets for 68k. And yes, it has MMU=y
> It doesn't enable any platforms, which is not supported, and thus it isn't
> known how many interrupts are needed.
>
> BTW, I have a local fix to change NR_IRQS to 1 in that case, but that's
> far from sufficient to build an MMU=y allnoconfig kernel.
Yeah. NR_IRQS=1 is lame.
Thanks,
tglx
