On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:07:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Hi Jiri, > > While testing a patch by Wang, that requires building with > libbabeltrace, I noticed that there are no feature detection message > telling that it was found successfully. The end result is the desired > one, it builds with babeltrace, but I wonder if we couldn't have the > [ok] line for it:
well, we removed it, because the latest version if libbabeltrace pkg perf needs wasn't present in common distros.. so for most users that would print 'OFF' as a status.. that might have changed now, dont know anyway, for libbabeltrace and other in FEATURE_TESTS_EXTRA it's not possible to print their status easily at the moment, because the status isn't known at the time tools/build/Makefile.feature is included in config/Makefile I'll check if we can reorg the code a little to get the full status at the end jirka > > > [acme@jouet linux]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf ; make > LIBBABELTRACE=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin > make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf' > BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build > > Auto-detecting system features: > ... dwarf: [ on ] > ... glibc: [ on ] > ... gtk2: [ on ] > ... libaudit: [ on ] > ... libbfd: [ on ] > ... libelf: [ on ] > ... libnuma: [ on ] > ... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] > ... libperl: [ on ] > ... libpython: [ on ] > ... libslang: [ on ] > ... libcrypto: [ on ] > ... libunwind: [ on ] > ... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] > ... zlib: [ on ] > ... lzma: [ on ] > ... get_cpuid: [ on ] > ... bpf: [ on ] > > GEN /tmp/build/perf/common-cmds.h > CC /tmp/build/perf/fixdep.o > LD /tmp/build/perf/fixdep-in.o > <SNIP> > [acme@jouet linux]$ ldd ~/bin/perf | grep babel > libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 > (0x00007fce5c405000) > libbabeltrace.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace.so.1 (0x00007fce5bd69000) > [acme@jouet linux]$ > > > - Arnaldo
