On 03/02/2016 01:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> [160301 10:55]:
drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:34:12: warning: symbol 'dm814x_adpll_early_init' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:58:12: warning: symbol
'dm814x_adpll_enable_init_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/ti/adpll.c:465 ti_adpll_recalc_rate() warn: should '__readw(d->regs + 20)
<< 18' be a 64 bit type?
drivers/clk/ti/adpll.c:945 ti_adpll_probe() error: we previously assumed
'd->clocks' could be null (see line 921)
The last one looks like a real bug because we don't return an
error on allocation failure.
Yeah nice, that's a real bug:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Looks good to me also.
Acked-by: Tero Kristo <[email protected]>
