On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/03/16 16:59, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>>
>> Add 'nvmem-composite' driver which allows to combine multiple chunks of
>> various NVMEM cells into a single continuous NVMEM device.
>
>
> My plan on this feature was add support inside the nvmem_cell_get itself,
> this makes the nvmem bindings more inline with bindings like pinctrl.
> Also I still want to keep nvmem simple as it can.
That's perfectly fine with me, I can change my patch to do that. My
thinking on implementing it as a standalone module was that this seems
to be a very niche functionality which not a lot of people would use,
so the code would be a part of your kernel only if you directly use
this feature.
>
> DT would look something like this.
>
> nvmem-provider-a {
> cell_a {
> reg = <0 2>;
> };
> };
>
> nvmem-provider-b {
> cell_b: cell_c {
> reg = <0 1>;
> };
> };
>
> nvmem-provider-c {
> cell_c: cell_c {
> reg = <3 2>;
> }
> };
>
> a-node {
> nvmem-cells = <&cell_a &cell_b &cell_c>
> nvmem-cell-names = "some-data";
> };
>
It's not very clear to me, possibly to my DT ignorance, how this would
handle the case of multiple variables. Say we have
a-node {
nvmem-cells = <&cell_a &cell_b>, ????;
nvmem-cell-names = "some-data", "more-data";
};
and I want "more-data" to reference only one phandle, how would this be handled?
Another minor nitpick about his is that if one's goal is to just
byteswap already defined nvmem_cell:
- N, where N is the length of the variable, new nvmem cells would
have to be defined
- All of them would have to use absolute address within the nvmem
provided, instead of referencing a byte relative to the position of
pre-defined cell
Thanks,
Andrey
