On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 19:46 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 02.03.2016 7:19 nachm. schrieb Joe Perches <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 12:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > The existing logging macros are fairly large and converting the > > > macros to functions make the object code smaller. > > Artem and Adrian are the nominal maintainers for ubifs. > > > > Artem last had a sign-off on a ubifs patch 6 months ago and > > Adrian's last one was over 3 years ago. > > > > Is there an expected ack/nack/applied handling time for a > > ubifs patch like this? > > > > Should this patch go to someone else? > > > > Should the MAINTAINERS entry for ubifs be changed to orphan? > No need to panic. I take care of the patch. :)
No worries, I'm calm. But if you're taking care of the patch and not the nominal maintainers, likely the MAINTAINERS entry should be updated. Presumably the equivalent ubi patch will be handled in the same fashion, For drivers/mtd/ubi, Artem is also a nominal maintainer, but last signed a patch in 2014. Likely the MAINTAINERS entry for UBI should be updated too. Maybe something like: --- MAINTAINERS | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 81302e4..927557c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11266,8 +11266,7 @@ S: Maintained F: drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c UBI FILE SYSTEM (UBIFS) -M: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]> -M: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> +M: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> L: [email protected] T: git git://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git W: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html @@ -11350,7 +11349,6 @@ F: Documentation/scsi/ufs.txt F: drivers/scsi/ufs/ UNSORTED BLOCK IMAGES (UBI) -M: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]> M: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> W: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ L: [email protected]
