On 21/02/16 03:41, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> BCM6358 has a shared TLB which conflicts with current SMP support, so it must
> be disabled for now.
> BCM6358 uses >= 0xfffe0000 addresses for internal registers, which need to be
> remapped (by using a simplified version of BRCM63xx ioremap.h).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <[email protected]>
> ---
>  v2: Use a different approach for remapping internal registers
> 
>  arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                    | 29 +++++++++++++++++------
>  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ioremap.h | 37 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ioremap.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c b/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c
> index 3553528..f834a86 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <asm/addrspace.h>
>  #include <asm/bmips.h>
>  #include <asm/bootinfo.h>
> @@ -35,9 +36,12 @@
>  
>  static const unsigned long kbase = VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS & 0xfff00000;
>  
> +phys_addr_t bmips_internal_registers;
> +
>  struct bmips_quirk {
> -     const char              *compatible;
> -     void                    (*quirk_fn)(void);
> +     const char *compatible;
> +     void (*quirk_fn)(void);
> +     const phys_addr_t regs;
>  };

That does not scale very well to having some sort of generic quirk
function here.

>  
>  static void kbase_setup(void)
> @@ -95,17 +99,27 @@ static void bcm6328_quirks(void)
>               bcm63xx_fixup_cpu1();
>  }
>  
> +static void bcm6358_quirks(void)
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * BCM6358 needs special handling for its shared TLB, so
> +      * disable SMP for now
> +      */
> +     bmips_smp_enabled = 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void bcm6368_quirks(void)
>  {
>       bcm63xx_fixup_cpu1();
>  }
>  
>  static const struct bmips_quirk bmips_quirk_list[] = {
> -     { "brcm,bcm3384-viper",         &bcm3384_viper_quirks           },
> -     { "brcm,bcm33843-viper",        &bcm3384_viper_quirks           },
> -     { "brcm,bcm6328",               &bcm6328_quirks                 },
> -     { "brcm,bcm6368",               &bcm6368_quirks                 },
> -     { "brcm,bcm63168",              &bcm6368_quirks                 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm3384-viper", &bcm3384_viper_quirks, 0 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm33843-viper", &bcm3384_viper_quirks, 0 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm6328", &bcm6328_quirks, 0 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm6358", &bcm6358_quirks, 0xfffe0000 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm6368", &bcm6368_quirks, 0 },
> +     { "brcm,bcm63168", &bcm6368_quirks, 0 },
>       { },
>  };
>  
> @@ -162,6 +176,7 @@ void __init plat_mem_setup(void)
>       for (q = bmips_quirk_list; q->quirk_fn; q++) {
>               if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(of_get_flat_dt_root(),
>                                            q->compatible)) {
> +                     bmips_internal_registers = q->regs;
>                       q->quirk_fn();
>               }
>       }
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ioremap.h 
> b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ioremap.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5ffca94
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ioremap.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_MACH_BMIPS_IOREMAP_H
> +#define __ASM_MACH_BMIPS_IOREMAP_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +extern phys_addr_t bmips_internal_registers;
> +
> +static inline phys_addr_t fixup_bigphys_addr(phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> +                                          phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> +     return phys_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_bmips_internal_registers(phys_addr_t offset)
> +{
> +     if (bmips_internal_registers != 0 && offset >= bmips_internal_registers)
> +             return 1;

Humm, we should probably just use a hardcoded constant here, and just
pick one which works for all SoCs, so the 3368 base address for
instance: 0xfff8_0000 seems like a good candidate, and also works for
other DSL SoCs too.
-- 
Florian

Reply via email to