Em Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:35:04PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> This implements having multiple sort keys in a single hierarchy level.
> Originally only single sort key is supported for each level, but now
> using the group syntax with '{ }', it can set more than one sort key in
> one level.  Note that now it needs to quote in order to prevent shell
> interpretation.
> 
> For example:
> 
>   $ perf report --hierarchy -s '{comm,dso},sym'
>   ...
>   #       Overhead  Command / Shared Object / Symbol

It works, but there is no difference on the one line above, the header,
to help differentiate the above from:


    $ perf report --hierarchy -s 'comm,dso,sym'

Also we don't warn the user that such groupings only make sense when
used with --hierarchy.

Anyway, applying the patch, those are things that can be done on top.

- Arnaldo


>   # ..............  ..........................................
>   #
>       48.67%        swapper          [kernel.vmlinux]
>          34.42%        [k] intel_idle
>           1.30%        [k] __tick_nohz_idle_enter
>           1.03%        [k] cpuidle_reflect
>        8.87%        firefox          libpthread-2.22.so
>           6.60%        [.] __GI___libc_recvmsg
>           1.18%        [.] pthread_cond_signal@@GLIBC_2.3.2
>           1.09%        [.] 0x000000000000ff4b
>        6.11%        Xorg             libc-2.22.so
>           5.27%        [.] __memcpy_sse2_unaligned
> 
> In the above example, the command name and the shared object name are
> shown on the same line but the symbol name is on the different line.
> Since the first two are grouped by '{}', they are in the same level.
> 
> Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/sort.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> index 71d45d147376..041f236379e0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> @@ -2310,18 +2310,40 @@ static int setup_sort_list(char *str, struct 
> perf_evlist *evlist)
>       char *tmp, *tok;
>       int ret = 0;
>       int level = 0;
> +     int next_level = 1;
> +     bool in_group = false;
> +
> +     do {
> +             tok = str;
> +             tmp = strpbrk(str, "{}, ");
> +             if (tmp) {
> +                     if (in_group)
> +                             next_level = level;
> +                     else
> +                             next_level = level + 1;
> +
> +                     if (*tmp == '{')
> +                             in_group = true;
> +                     else if (*tmp == '}')
> +                             in_group = false;
> +
> +                     *tmp = '\0';
> +                     str = tmp + 1;
> +             }
>  
> -     for (tok = strtok_r(str, ", ", &tmp);
> -                     tok; tok = strtok_r(NULL, ", ", &tmp)) {
> -             ret = sort_dimension__add(tok, evlist, level++);
> -             if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> -                     error("Invalid --sort key: `%s'", tok);
> -                     break;
> -             } else if (ret == -ESRCH) {
> -                     error("Unknown --sort key: `%s'", tok);
> -                     break;
> +             if (*tok) {
> +                     ret = sort_dimension__add(tok, evlist, level);
> +                     if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> +                             error("Invalid --sort key: `%s'", tok);
> +                             break;
> +                     } else if (ret == -ESRCH) {
> +                             error("Unknown --sort key: `%s'", tok);
> +                             break;
> +                     }
>               }
> -     }
> +
> +             level = next_level;
> +     } while (tmp);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.7.2

Reply via email to