On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > Isn't that randomization, anywhere from 0x10000 to ELF_ET_DYN_BASE, > > sure to place the ET_DYN from time to time just where the comment says > > it's trying to avoid? I assume that somehow results in the error reported. > > Hmm.. It's certainly the case that it would appear that the randomization > might put the binary just under the heap, and cause conflicts with brk > and the mmap heap. > > You're right. I'm inclined to just revert it, modulo some comments from > others. Marcus?
After thinking about this, yes. I would rather have a working range used here (perhaps like Hugh suggested), but feel free to revert the original patch if you are not confident with it. Ciao, Marcus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/