On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Jianyu Zhan <[email protected]> wrote: > My purpose of posting this patch set is trying to make the system vector > layout > reveal this fact. > > we have SMP system vector defined first( these may rely on or not rely > on CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC), > > then comes the CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC dependent vector definition. > > then comes the rest vector definition that not only depends on > CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC, but > also others(like MCE, virtualization). > > Among these stands out IRQ_WORK, which neither depends on SMP nor > CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC. >
My wording is incorrect, should be like this: The new system vector layout: First, two special vector: spurious and error. Second, we have SMP system vector defined first( these implicitly reply on CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC), Third, comes the CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC dependent vector definition, but not necessary SMP dependent.( Among these stands out IRQ_WORK, which neither depends on SMP nor CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC.) Finally, comes the rest vector definition that not only depends on CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC, but also others(like MCE, virtualization). Regards, Jianyu Zhan
