On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:09:14AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
> Get rid of T124-specific PDIV/HOTSPOT hack.
> tegra-soctherm.c contained a hack to set the SENSOR_PDIV and
> SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFFSET registers - it just did two writes of
> T124-specific opaque values.  Convert these into a form that can be
> substituted on a per-chip basis, and into structure fields that have
> at least some independent meaning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <w...@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra-soctherm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra-soctherm.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra-soctherm.c
> index b3ec0faa2bee..b4b791ebfbb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra-soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra-soctherm.c
> @@ -48,14 +48,12 @@
>  #define SENSOR_CONFIG2_THERMB_SHIFT          0
>  
>  #define SENSOR_PDIV                          0x1c0
> -#define SENSOR_PDIV_T124                     0x8888
>  #define SENSOR_PDIV_CPU_MASK                 (0xf << 12)
>  #define SENSOR_PDIV_GPU_MASK                 (0xf << 8)
>  #define SENSOR_PDIV_MEM_MASK                 (0xf << 4)
>  #define SENSOR_PDIV_PLLX_MASK                        (0xf << 0)
>  
>  #define SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF                   0x1c4
> -#define SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF_T124                      0x00060600
>  #define SENSOR_HOTSPOT_CPU_MASK                      (0xff << 16)
>  #define SENSOR_HOTSPOT_GPU_MASK                      (0xff << 8)
>  #define SENSOR_HOTSPOT_MEM_MASK                      (0xff << 0)
> @@ -436,6 +434,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       struct resource *res;
>       unsigned int i;
>       int err;
> +     u32 pdiv, hotspot;
>  
>       const struct tegra_tsensor *tsensors = t124_tsensors;
>       const struct tegra_tsensor_group **ttgs = tegra124_tsensor_groups;
> @@ -493,8 +492,19 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>                       goto disable_clocks;
>       }
>  
> -     writel(SENSOR_PDIV_T124, tegra->regs + SENSOR_PDIV);
> -     writel(SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF_T124, tegra->regs + SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF);
> +     /* Program pdiv and hotspot offsets per THERM */
> +     pdiv = readl(tegra->regs + SENSOR_PDIV);
> +     hotspot = readl(tegra->regs + SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF);
> +     for (i = 0; i < TEGRA124_SOCTHERM_SENSOR_NUM; ++i) {
> +             pdiv = REG_SET_MASK(pdiv, ttgs[i]->pdiv_mask,
> +                                 ttgs[i]->pdiv);
> +             if (ttgs[i]->id != TEGRA124_SOCTHERM_SENSOR_PLLX)
> +                     hotspot =  REG_SET_MASK(hotspot,
> +                                             ttgs[i]->pllx_hotspot_mask,
> +                                             ttgs[i]->pllx_hotspot_diff);
> +     }
> +     writel(pdiv, tegra->regs + SENSOR_PDIV);
> +     writel(hotspot, tegra->regs + SENSOR_HOTSPOT_OFF);

Is the above logic the same for all supported chips? e.g. do we always
skip pllx for hotspot configuration?


>  
>       /* Initialize thermctl sensors */
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to