From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>

3.4.111-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 48900cb6af4282fa0fb6ff4d72a81aa3dadb5c39 upstream.

virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes
that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't
always true with a fraglist.

A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow
the sg array, leading to memory corruption.

Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle.

Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index efb50d6..27c82ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1036,9 +1036,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
        /* Do we support "hardware" checksums? */
        if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
                /* This opens up the world of extra features. */
-               dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG|NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
+               dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
                if (csum)
-                       dev->features |= 
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG|NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
+                       dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
 
                if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO)) {
                        dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_UFO
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to