On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:51:20PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> 2016년 03월 17일 19:39에 Dan Carpenter 이(가) 쓴 글:
> > We know "ret" is zero and the test makes static checkers complain so
> > let's delete this printk.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_mic.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_mic.c
> > index 890c9b1..12db353 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_mic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_mic.c
> > @@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ static void mic_set_path(struct exynos_mic *mic, bool 
> > enable)
> >             val &= ~(MIC0_RGB_MUX | MIC0_I80_MUX | MIC0_ON_MUX);
> >  
> >     regmap_write(mic->sysreg, DSD_CFG_MUX, val);
> > -   if (ret)
> > -           DRM_ERROR("mic: Failed to read system register\n");
> 
> I think we missed to keep return value from regmap_write function,
>       ret = regmap_write(mic->sysreg, ....);
>       if (ret)
>               ...

Yeah.  You're right.

regards,
dan carpenter

Reply via email to