Dear Daniel, On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:02:02 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 09:47 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Currently, we check cpuidle_ops.suspend every time when entering a > > low-power idle state. But this check could be avoided in this hot path > > by moving it into arm_cpuidle_read_ops() to reduce arm_cpuidle_suspend > > overhead a bit. > > This patch makes sense but the ARM64 part is missing. > Here is the ARM64 part, you are also in the "To" list ;) http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/417713.html Thanks, Jisheng
