On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > OK, so while the code in check_no_collision() seems sensible, it relies > > on borken bits. > > > > The whole chain_hlocks and /proc/lockdep_chains stuff appears to have > > been buggered from the start. > > > > The below patch should fix this. > > > > checkpatch.pl says... > > WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf > #124: FILE: kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:145: > + seq_printf(m, "(buggered) "); Yeah, sod checkpatch ;-) What's in your /proc/lockdep_stats file?
