On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On arm64 systems, using /dev/port does not really make sense; this is
>> historically used for other architectures to access ISA IO ports, which
>> with any luck do not exist on arm64 platforms.  With the following snippet
>> of perl code (from Jeff Bastian <[email protected]>), we can reliably
>> panic an arm64 system with PCI enabled:
>>
>>       #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>>       # extracted from sensors-detect from lm_sensors
>>       # to reproduce kernel crash when probing the
>>       # Super-I/O ports
>>       use Fcntl qw(:DEFAULT :seek);
>>       sysopen(IOPORTS, "/dev/port", O_RDWR);
>>       binmode(IOPORTS);
>>       sysseek(IOPORTS, 0x2e, 0);
>>       syswrite(IOPORTS, pack("C", 0x0d), 1);

There are plenty of ways to crash a system as the root user...

>> So, make sure CONFIG_DEVPORT cannot be set on arm64; it cannot really be
>> used and it allows us to crash a kernel from user space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/char/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> index b272397..c532f62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ config TELCLOCK
>>
>>  config DEVPORT
>>       bool
>> -     depends on !M68K
>> +     depends on !M68K && !ARM64
>
> Why not fix the real bug here, it's odd that only these two arches need
> this disabled, don't you agree?

In fact even the !M68K dependency is odd.
The logic seems to originate from commit 153dcc54df826d2f ("[PATCH] mem driver:
fix conditional on isa i/o support"), which accidentally changed an "||" into
an "&&".

Will send a patch later...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to