On (04/09/16 22:05), Rui Salvaterra wrote: > These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define > HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this > isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition.
yes, besides ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS exists only in lib/lz4/lz4defs.h > Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> -ss > --- > lib/lz4/lz4defs.h | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h > index 0710a62..c79d7ea 100644 > --- a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h > +++ b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h > @@ -24,9 +24,7 @@ > typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S; > typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S; > typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S; > -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \ > - || defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \ > - && defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) > +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) > > #define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v) > #define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v) > -- > 2.7.4 >
