* Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 09:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > * Anton Blanchard <[email protected]> [2016-04-06 21:59:50]: > > > > > > > Looks good, and the patch below does fix the oops for me. > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > -- > > > > > > > > task_pt_regs() can return NULL for kernel threads, so add a check. > > > > This fixes an oops at boot on ppc64. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]> > > > > > > Works for me too. > > > > > > Reported-and-Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> > > > > Could someone please re-send the fix, because it has not reached me nor > > lkml. > > It did hit LKML: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160406215950.04bc3f0b@kryten > > But that did have some verbiage at the top. > > Anton's also resent it directly To you.
So it was in my Spam folder, due to the following SPF softfail: Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning [email protected] does not designate 198.145.29.136 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.145.29.136; have the patch now. Thanks, Ingo
