On 04/20/2016 09:54 AM, Allen Pais wrote:
Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> --- arch/sparc/include/asm/spitfire.h | 1 + arch/sparc/kernel/cpu.c | 6 ++++++ arch/sparc/kernel/cpumap.c | 1 + arch/sparc/kernel/head_64.S | 8 ++++++++ arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c | 7 ++++++- arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 3 +++ 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spitfire.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spitfire.h index 56f9338..1d8321c 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spitfire.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spitfire.h @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ #define SUN4V_CHIP_SPARC_M6 0x06 #define SUN4V_CHIP_SPARC_M7 0x07 #define SUN4V_CHIP_SPARC64X 0x8a +#define SUN4V_CHIP_SPARC_SN 0x8b #define SUN4V_CHIP_UNKNOWN 0xffLooks good to me. Do you think adding these also this patch makes sense or it could be a separate patch. } - if (!strcmp(sparc_pmu_type, "sparc-m7")) { + if (!strcmp(sparc_pmu_type, "sparc-m7") || + !strcmp(sparc_pmu_type, "sparc-sn")) { sparc_pmu = &sparc_m7_pmu; return true; Acked-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]> - Allen
I would recommend that to be a separate patch. My goal with this patch is to address the core capabilities of sonoma and enable kernel to get optimized performance from the processor. Monitoring the performance can be a separate patch.
-- Khalid
