+ Sascha On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:48:18PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:35:59AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > From: Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]> > > > > This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree > <cut> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h > > index 97b86c5..6ef932a 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h > > @@ -335,12 +335,14 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { > > * @get_trend: a pointer to a function that reads the sensor temperature > > trend. > > * @set_emul_temp: a pointer to a function that sets sensor emulated > > * temperature. > > + * @set_trips: a pointer to a function that set low/high trip temperature. > > */ > > struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops { > > int (*get_temp)(void *, int *); > > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); > > int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, int); > > int (*set_trip_temp)(void *, int, int); > > + int (*set_trips)(void *, int, int); > > This is unfortunately a diverges from API available on thermal core. Can > you please add first on thermal core then, use it in of thermal? > > I don't want to have callbacks available only via of thermal. If we > allow it, OF thermal becomes a separate API.
What ever happened to this effort? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/59451 Patch 12 and 13 look to accomplish something similar, yet they do what Eduardo suggested. I was testing that series at my previous job, but unfortunately (for the fate of this series) I left that employer before I could finish reviewing and testing it. Perhaps Caesar can resurrect and test it? Brian
