When commit b554e1450658 ("regulator: tps65917/palmas: Add bypass
ops for LDOs with bypass capability") introduced bypass capability
to palmas regulator, it went with the assumption that regulator
regmap helpers just check val against the bypass_mask.

Unfortunately, this ignored the explicit "on" and "off" values when
the register value is masked with bypass_mask in commit ca5d1b3524b4
("regulator: helpers: Modify helpers enabling multi-bit control").

With the recent commit dd1a571daee7 ("regulator: helpers: Ensure
bypass register field matches ON value"), this issue gets highlighted
and fails tps65917/palmas based platforms which need regulators/ldos
that have bypass capability.

Introduce the bypass_on value appropriately for tps65917/palmas
regulator.

Fixes: b554e1450658 ("regulator: tps65917/palmas: Add bypass ops for LDOs with 
bypass capability")
Cc: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com>
---

Fixes regression in next-20160426 for DRA7 platforms and BeagleBoard-X15

Fail in boot: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16065715/

 drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c 
b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index 6efc7ee8aea3..c83e06b2cedb 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -944,6 +944,8 @@ static int palmas_ldo_registration(struct palmas_pmic *pmic,
                        if (id == PALMAS_REG_LDO9) {
                                desc->ops = &palmas_ops_ldo9;
                                desc->bypass_reg = desc->enable_reg;
+                               desc->bypass_val_on =
+                                               PALMAS_LDO9_CTRL_LDO_BYPASS_EN;
                                desc->bypass_mask =
                                                PALMAS_LDO9_CTRL_LDO_BYPASS_EN;
                        }
@@ -1055,6 +1057,8 @@ static int tps65917_ldo_registration(struct palmas_pmic 
*pmic,
                            id == TPS65917_REG_LDO2) {
                                desc->ops = &tps65917_ops_ldo_1_2;
                                desc->bypass_reg = desc->enable_reg;
+                               desc->bypass_val_on =
+                                               TPS65917_LDO1_CTRL_BYPASS_EN;
                                desc->bypass_mask =
                                                TPS65917_LDO1_CTRL_BYPASS_EN;
                        }
@@ -1206,6 +1210,7 @@ static int palmas_smps_registration(struct palmas_pmic 
*pmic,
                                desc->enable_mask = SMPS10_BOOST_EN;
                        desc->bypass_reg = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_SMPS_BASE,
                                                            PALMAS_SMPS10_CTRL);
+                       desc->bypass_val_on = SMPS10_BYPASS_EN;
                        desc->bypass_mask = SMPS10_BYPASS_EN;
                        desc->min_uV = 3750000;
                        desc->uV_step = 1250000;
-- 
2.8.0

Reply via email to