From: Stefan Agner <[email protected]>

By using the SD/MMC host device ID as a starting point for block
device numbering, one can reliably predict the first block device
name (at least for the first controller). This is especially useful
for SoCs with multiple SD/MMC host controller, where the controller
with index 0 is connected to a eMMC device.

Usually the first controller gets the first block device name ID,
however this is not guaranteed. Also if the first controller is
aliased as second controller and visa-versa (using device tree
aliases), the block device name ID assignation is not ordered by
the SD/MMC host device ID (since mmc_rescan is called in order of
the memory mapped pheripherial addresses).

Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 9fef7f04c4e6..bcf4fdbb5221 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -2215,7 +2215,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct 
mmc_card *card,
         * index anymore so we keep track of a name index.
         */
        if (!subname) {
-               md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices);
+               md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices,
+                               card->host->index);
                __set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use);
        } else
                md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *)
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

Reply via email to