Carveout size is primarily extracted from the firmware binary.  However,
DT can over-ride this by providing a different (smaller) size.  We're
adding protection here to ensure the we only allocate the smaller of the
two provided sizes in order to decrease the risk of clashes.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 3d9798c..c3cad708 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
        struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mapping;
        struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
        struct device *dma_dev;
+       struct rproc_subdev *sub;
        dma_addr_t dma;
        void *va;
        int ret;
@@ -600,6 +601,14 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        dma_dev = rproc_subdev_lookup(rproc, "carveout");
+       sub = dev_get_drvdata(dma_dev);
+
+       if (rsc->len > resource_size(sub->res)) {
+               dev_warn(dev, "carveout too big (0x%x): clipping to 0x%x\n",
+                        rsc->len, resource_size(sub->res));
+               rsc->len = resource_size(sub->res);
+       }
+
        va = dma_alloc_coherent(dma_dev, rsc->len, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!va) {
                dev_err(dev->parent, "dma_alloc_coherent err: %d\n", rsc->len);
-- 
2.8.0

Reply via email to