On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:11:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > For sure page faulting must consider what kind of fault is it. > > Or we gonna drop such code at all? > > That code was bogus. (Well, it was correct unless user code had a way > to create a funny high mapping in an otherwise 32-bit task, but it > still should have been TASK_SIZE_MAX.) Fix sent.
OK, great!
